Will Irish unity be back on the agenda after Sinn Fein’s triumph?

Perhaps it marks the beginning of some kind of democratic revolution. The overwhelming victory of Sinn Fein, hard left and independent candidates in the Republic’s local and European elections “could mark the end of party politics as we know it”, said Stephen Collins, the Irish Times’ political editor. The class divide was striking, particularly in Dublin, with a massive swing to Sinn Fein and other left-wing parties in the poorer areas hit hardest by six years of austerity, while the Fine Gael vote held up reasonably well in the less-affected leafy suburbs.

Sinn Fein trebled its number of local council seats. Its major competitor for Irish working class votes, the Labour Party, with a tiny 7% first preference vote, was decimated to the extent that there must be real fears for its future. The ‘two and a half parties’ mould that has dominated Irish politics for more than 90 years looks like being replaced by a ‘three and a quarter parties’ version, with Sinn Fein as the new power-broker. The outspoken Fine Gael transport minister, Leo Varadkar, put it bluntly (if not completely accurately, given Fianna Fail’s surprising resilience) when he said the choice in the future would be between a Fine Gael or a Sinn Fein-led government.

What is true about Varadkar’s statement is that it shows the success of Sinn Fein’s longer-term strategy for the island of Ireland: to put the party into or close to power in both jurisdictions so that it can ratchet up its demands for Irish unity. That master strategist Gerry Adams would dearly love to be a position where he can claim that Sinn Fein’s ‘mandate’ – the party’s favourite word these days – as the biggest party in the North (with the largest share of the first preference vote in the European and local elections) and the second biggest in the South (which must be its aim in the next general election, now likely sooner rather than later) demands a Border Poll and other moves towards unity.

Whether electoral support for Sinn Fein means popular support for unity in the short term is another matter. It is clear from recent opinion polls in the North that there it does not. Last September’s Belfast Telegraph poll showed that less than 4% of Northerners said they wanted a united Ireland now and 22% wanted it in 20 years. Among Northern Protestants the figures were respectively 0% and 8%.

An Irish Times/Ipsos MRBI poll in November 2012 showed a typically more ambivalent picture in the Republic: 69% said they wanted a united Ireland and were prepared to pay more taxes for it. This is a classic example of the unrealistic, aspirational political thinking of so many Irish people. As long as unity doesn’t happen for a long time (35% said it would never happen; 15% said it would happen in 50 years and 22% said it would happen in 25 years), they are prepared to pay higher taxes for it. However in the real world of the here and now they are deeply unhappy at paying what citizens in almost every other European country pay:  property taxes and water charges. Could one find a better example of a united Ireland as ‘pie in the sky’?

None of which prevents the Sinn Fein leadership – in their Leninist fashion (democratic when it suits them) – from driving on towards their impossible (in the short to medium term) and deeply destabilising primary goal of a united Ireland.

For those of us who believe that the only way towards any kind of unity is the lengthy and extremely difficult business of trying to bring the people of the island into some kind of mutual regard and understanding, this is delusional stuff which can only lead to a return of violence.

However maybe Sinn Fein’s onward march will serve to ignite some kind of debate about future Irish unity in the South (although I won’t be holding my breath). I could suggest some questions as part of that notional debate: Is there any alternative to Sinn Fein’s view of the future direction of the island – ‘steamrollering’ the unionists into a united Ireland by outbreeding them, outsmarting them and undermining their morale?  Has the slow business of gaining the trust of Northern unionists and guaranteeing the position of Northern nationalists by mutually beneficial power-sharing and North-South cooperation – the policy followed for the past 30-40 years by successive Irish governments  – run out of steam? Do people in the South have any fellow-feeling or identification with the people of the North as fellow Irishwomen and men?  Do they believe, in particular, that those difficult people, the unionists, have any part to play in the future of the island? Where stands the relationship between North and South in the changing circumstances of moves towards an independent Scotland and British withdrawal from the EU? Is the dominant feeling among most Southerners that Northern Ireland should be allowed – with some friendly assistance where needed – to work out its own future (starting with ways to begin to overcome its interminable sectarianism)?

My personal opinion is that the view of the distinguished and sadly deceased political scientist, Peter Mair, still holds, despite Sinn Fein’s electoral surge as the main party of protest in the Republic. In 1987 he wrote: “Any real move to press for Irish unity, be it from within the Republic, from Northern Ireland, or from Britain, is unlikely to be welcomed by the average citizen in the Republic. Unity would be nice. But if it’s going to cost money, or result in violence, or disrupt the moral and social equilibrium, then it’s not worth it. Certainly, politics in the Republic is about nationalism, but for much of the post-war epoch the vision of that nationalism has extended only to the 26 counties.”

This entry was posted in General, Sinn Fein. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Will Irish unity be back on the agenda after Sinn Fein’s triumph?

  1. hegemonic says:

    Brilliant, Andy. Just brilliant.


    Dr Robin Wilson







    josephrobinsonwilson (Skype)

    #44 South Studios

    Tates Avenue

    Belfast BT9 7BS

    Northern Ireland

  2. Keith Troughton says:

    Andy, I’ve been giving this whole question a lot of thought lately. I was one of those who voted for Sinn Féin this time round, the first time I’ve ever voted for them. I put together some thoughts as to why and here’s my answer:

    ‘There are days when I wake and worry, today was one of those days. I woke at around 5am feeling that I had to justify myself to a particular friend and a group of her friends that I have some acquaintance with. In my head I was at a dinner party in her house and my wife has just told her that I voted Sinn Féin in the Local and European elections. I try to explain my anger at the government, how everything seems to be pushed into the middle these days. How the water charge represents the last bit of joy being taken from me, the sheer freedom of turning on a tap and not having to worry. How we’ve given up our second car, changed the car we have for a diesel powered one to cut costs. How we don’t have an extravagant lifestyle, don’t go out to dinner much, don’t do shopping trips to New York and yet it is still not enough. How my wife has had her salary cut three times. How we paid €19,000 stamp duty on the house we live in but still have to pay the full property tax. How, despite having no mortgage we have to take money from savings to live: savings we want for our daughter’s education and our old age. How we struggle to hang on to our healthcare insurance. What we have isn’t a lot to ask for, but the government isn’t listening to that. It is pushing everything into the middle: we are paying too much, taking too much of the responsibility of what happened on our shoulders.
    I worry a lot, more than I should no doubt, but I worry. I feel hurt too and now I want the government to take some of that worry and hurt and do something with it. I want then to find solutions that don’t involve me having to hurt and worry any more than I do: enough is enough.
    I am a fifty eight year old father of a young child, a stay at home dad married to a civil servant. I come from England, my family moved her when I was eleven. My parents were English and I had a private secondary education in a Church of Ireland school. I spent a very brief period of my youth in the Royal Irish Rangers. Sinn Féin is not my natural political home, but I voted for them this time as a protest. I want the government to hurt. I want the government to listen. I pray that they will worry about me a bit more, that come the next election I don’t have to worry how I am going to tell my friends that I went outside my natural political home again.’

    I joined the British army as a potential officer. During the process I was interviewed by a Brigadier General of the old guard, complete with handlebar moustache and plummy voice. He looked at my paperwork, then looked at me and said: “Now Troughton, you’ve lived in Irealnd a long time, what do you think of the IRA?” I told him that I didn’t like the way they were going about it, but that I believed their political aim of a united Ireland was right. This was the nineteen seventies and I was clearly a callow youth; not for my political view, but for ever thinking that view was going to advance a career as a British soldier. Nearly forty years on I still hold that view. Quite what that vision consists of I don’t know, but I do know I didn’t vote for Sinn Féin because of their nationalist vision. At best I can say that I believe a united Ireland where all the people of the country are equally valued would be a fantastic country to live in.

    Best wishes. Keith.

  3. The was significant Protestant support for all-Ireland Home Rule prior to 1914. My father Joe Johnston wrote has supportive book in 1913, critical of the UVF threat; see this at http://www.rjtechne.org/century130703/1910s/cwujj/index.htm but alas the the gun became dominant politically in 1914 via Larne and then via Howth. There is however evidence that this was master-minded primarily by the imperial elite, who were planning the war, and to make Germany think they were otherwise occupied.. My father went on to make his career in Dublin. The family was from Castlecaulfield in Tyrone, tenants of Lord Charlemont.

    The basic republican idea in Europe is Protestant, rooted in the Reformation period. William of Orange, who earlier had a leading role in the Dutch Republic, was able to help the residual supporters of the earlier English republic to impose a constitution of sorts on the English absolute monarchy. Sinn Fein should give William some credit for this, and commemorate him, as a gesture seeking common ground with the Protestant commnity, who for some reason retain the idea that the monarchy in England is still worthy of support, despite its increasing irrelevance. It needs to be recognised that a constitutional monarchy is a step in the direction of a republic, and an improvment on an absolute monarchy. Political evolution takes place and is to be encouraged. The development in Scotland are interesting and may help to trigger some re-thinking among the descendants of the Scottish settlers of the 17thC, which included the ancestors of our family.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.